2006 Frog’s Leap Chardonnay

This is actually going to be a double review. One will be for the Frog’s Leap as the title of this blog suggests, the other will be a brief one for a 2005 Charles Krug Pinot Noir. I was kindly invited over by friends last night for dinner here in Yuma, Arizona. Like my mother trained me I did not show up empty handed. I decided on the Frog’s Leap as I had read a few blurbs in the past about their Chardonnay’s and last time I was in San Francisco I almost grabbed one to coif. The Krug pinot was simply a guess based on price and marketing. I knew that chicken (which was excellent btw!), rice and salad were on the menu so I tried to avoid a full bodied red that might dwarf the meal so with Chardonnay and Pinot in hand I arrived.

The Krug was a disappointment, it lacked good fruit, was overly acidic, not balanced and left my hosts with lingering tannins. For $26US (I am sure it would be $40+ at home) this wine failed to excite or deliver on what is a lofty price tag for the store and area it was bought in. I was mostly frustrated by the lack of consistency in the wine, I expected more.

The Frog’s Leap on the other was delicious. Unlike many Napa Chardonnay’s the oak was kept to a minimum. There was a slight butteriness to it and good fruit. Citrus on the nose led to a nice palate of aromas on the tasting. Grapefruit, peach and pear with green apple showing it’s head as we progressed through the bottle. This is a very well made wine. Luckily for us, the LCBO carries this wine and it is reasonably priced ($33CDN while it was $24US here). This will not disappoint or embarrass you if you are amongst people who truly like Chardonnays.

Subjective ratings: Krug gets an 80 out of 100 while the Frog’s Leap gets an 88.



About CanadianWineGuy

The Wine Guy, He's Canadian, they call him CanadianWineGuy
This entry was posted in American, Wine and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply